Impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading: Summary and consensus statements of group 1—The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021

  • Nikos Donos
    Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London (QMUL London UK
  • Nele Van Asche
    Centre for Periodontology and Oral Implants KULeuven Leuven Belgium
  • Aron Naim Akbar
    Health Technology Assessment‐Odontology (HTA‐O) Malmö University Malmö Sweden
  • Helena Francisco
    Departamento de Cirurgia Oral e Implantologia Faculdade de Medicina Dentária Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
  • Oscar Gonzales
    Department of Periodontology Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain
  • Klaus Gotfredsen
    Oral Rehabilitation Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
  • Robert Haas
    Academy for Oral Implantology Vienna Austria
  • Arndt Happe
    Department of Prosthetic Dentistry University Ulm Center of Dentistry Germany and Private Practice Münster Germany
  • Natalie Leow
    Periodontology Unit UCL‐Eastman Dental Institute London UK
  • Jose Manuel Navarro
    Private Practice Harley Street London UK
  • Turker Ornekol
    Cosmodent Center for Dentistry and Dental Implants Istanbul Turkey
  • Michael Payer
    Department of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics University Clinic of Dental Medicine & Oral Health Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
  • Franck Renouard
    Private Practice Paris France
  • Henning Schliephake
    Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery University Medicine‐Augusta‐University Göttingen Germany

抄録

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>This publication reports on the EAO workshop group 1 summaries, discussions and consensus statements based on four systematic reviews evaluating the impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods</jats:title><jats:p>The first of the systematic reviews was on the influence of the timing of implant placement and loading in the biological outcomes of implant‐supported fixed partial dentures. The second systematic review evaluated the influence of the timing of implant placement and loading on the aesthetic outcomes in single‐tooth implants. The third systematic review was on the long‐term outcomes of maxillary single‐tooth implants in relation to timing protocols of implant placement and loading and the fourth on patient's perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry. The group evaluated these systematic reviews, provided comments and additions as required and agreed on the relevant consensus statements as well as on clinical and research recommendations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Different timings of implant placement/loading presented with high implant survival rates. The systematic reviews evaluated from this working group provided a number of conclusions based on the available/current literature. However, the specific topic of timing is an area that further research is required in order to provide detailed guidelines for the different protocols to be employed.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ