Quantifying the daily economic impact of extreme space weather due to failure in electricity transmission infrastructure

  • Edward J. Oughton
    Centre for Risk Studies, Judge Business School University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
  • Andrew Skelton
    Centre for Risk Studies, Judge Business School University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
  • Richard B. Horne
    British Antarctic Survey Natural Environment Research Council Cambridge UK
  • Alan W. P. Thomson
    British Geological Survey Natural Environment Research Council Edinburgh UK
  • Charles T. Gaunt
    Department of Electrical Engineering University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa

書誌事項

公開日
2017-01
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1002/2016sw001491
公開者
American Geophysical Union (AGU)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Extreme space weather due to coronal mass ejections has the potential to cause considerable disruption to the global economy by damaging the transformers required to operate electricity transmission infrastructure. However, expert opinion is split between the potential outcome being one of a temporary regional blackout and of a more prolonged event. The temporary blackout scenario proposed by some is expected to last the length of the disturbance, with normal operations resuming after a couple of days. On the other hand, others have predicted widespread equipment damage with blackout scenarios lasting months. In this paper we explore the potential costs associated with failure in the electricity transmission infrastructure in the U.S. due to extreme space weather, focusing on <jats:italic>daily economic loss</jats:italic>. This provides insight into the direct and indirect economic consequences of how an extreme space weather event may affect domestic production, as well as other nations, via supply chain linkages. By exploring the sensitivity of the blackout zone, we show that on average the direct economic cost incurred from disruption to electricity represents only 49% of the total potential macroeconomic cost. Therefore, if indirect supply chain costs are not considered when undertaking cost‐benefit analysis of space weather forecasting and mitigation investment, the total potential macroeconomic cost is not correctly represented. The paper contributes to our understanding of the economic impact of space weather, as well as making a number of key methodological contributions relevant for future work. Further economic impact assessment of this threat must consider multiday, multiregional events.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Space Weather

    Space Weather 15 (1), 65-83, 2017-01

    American Geophysical Union (AGU)

被引用文献 (6)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ