Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews

書誌事項

公開日
2020-02-14
権利情報
  • http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
  • 10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6
公開者
Springer Science and Business Media LLC

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Loneliness and social isolation are growing public health concerns in our ageing society. Whilst these experiences occur across the life span, 50% of individuals aged over 60 are at risk of social isolation and one-third will experience some degree of loneliness later in life. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the range of interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults that have been evaluated; in terms of intervention conceptualisation, categorisation, and components.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Three electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase and Medline) were systematically searched for relevant published reviews of interventions for loneliness and social isolation. Inclusion criteria were: review of any type, published in English, a target population of older people and reported data on the categorisation of loneliness and/or social isolation interventions. Data extracted included: categories of interventions and the reasoning underpinning this categorisation. The methodology framework proposed by Arskey and O’Malley and further developed by Levac, et al. was used to guide the scoping review process.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>A total of 33 reviews met the inclusion criteria, evaluating a range of interventions targeted at older people residing in the community or institutionalised settings. Authors of reviews included in this paper often used the same terms to categorise different intervention components and many did not provide a clear definition of these terms. There were inconsistent meanings attributed to intervention characteristics. Overall, interventions were commonly categorised on the basis of: 1) group or one-to-one delivery mode, 2) the goal of the intervention, and 3) the intervention type. Several authors replicated the categorisation system used in previous reviews.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Many interventions have been developed to combat loneliness and social isolation among older people. The individuality of the experience of loneliness and isolation may cause difficulty in the delivery of standardised interventions. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing loneliness or social isolation, and hence the need to tailor interventions to suit the needs of individuals, specific groups or the degree of loneliness experienced. Therefore, future research should be aimed at discerning what intervention works for whom, in what particular context and how.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

収録刊行物

  • BMC Public Health

    BMC Public Health 20 (1), 129-, 2020-02-14

    Springer Science and Business Media LLC

被引用文献 (13)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ