Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines

  • M. Brindle
    Department of Surgery, Alberta Children's Hospital , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • G. Nelson
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • D. N. Lobo
    Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre , Nottingham, UK
  • O. Ljungqvist
    Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital , Örebro, Sweden
  • U. O. Gustafsson
    Department of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden

抄録

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>ERAS® Society guidelines are holistic, multidisciplinary tools designed to improve outcomes after surgery. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach was initially developed for colorectal surgery and has been implemented successfully across a large number of settings, resulting in improved patient outcomes. As the ERAS approach is increasingly being adopted worldwide and new guidelines are being generated for new populations, there is a need to define an ERAS® Society guideline and the methodology that should be followed in its development.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The ERAS® Society recommended approach for developing new guidelines is based on the creation of multidisciplinary guideline development groups responsible for defining topics, planning the literature search, and assessing the quality of the evidence.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Clear definitions for the elements of an ERAS guideline involve multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches impacting on multiple patient outcomes. Recommended methodology for guideline development follows a rigorous approach with systematic identification and evaluation of evidence, and consensus-based development of recommendations. Guidelines should then be evaluated and reviewed regularly to ensure that the best and most up-to-date evidence is used consistently to support surgical patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>There is a need for a standardized, evidence-informed approach to both the development of new ERAS® Society guidelines, and the adaptation and revision of existing guidelines.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

収録刊行物

  • BJS Open

    BJS Open 4 (1), 157-163, 2020-02-01

    Oxford University Press (OUP)

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ