- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Signal-to-noise Ratio Measurement in Parallel MRI with Subtraction Mapping and Consecutive Methods
-
- Imai Hiroshi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Anjo Kosei Hospital
-
- Miyati Tosiaki
- Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University
-
- Ogura Akio
- Department of Radiology, Kyoto City Hospital
-
- Doi Tsukasa
- Department of Radiology, Nara Prefectural Nara Hospital
-
- Tsuchihashi Toshio
- Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
-
- Machida Yoshio
- MRI Systems Development Department, TOSHIBA Medical Systems Corporation
-
- Kobayashi Masato
- Department of Radiology, Nagano Municipal Hospital
-
- Shimizu Kouzou
- Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University Hospital
-
- Kitou Yoshihiro
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University Hospital
Bibliographic Information
- Other Title
-
- 差分マップ法および連続撮像法によるParallel MRI画像のSNR測定
- サブン マップホウ オヨビ レンゾク サツゾウホウ ニ ヨル Parallel MRI ガゾウ ノ SNR ソクテイ
Search this article
Description
When measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an image the used parallel magnetic resonance imaging, it was confirmed that there was a problem in the application of past SNR measurement. With the method of measuring the noise from the background signal, SNR with parallel imaging was higher than that without parallel imaging. In the subtraction method (NEMA standard), which sets a wide region of interest, the white noise was not evaluated correctly although SNR was close to the theoretical value. We proposed two techniques because SNR in parallel imaging was not uniform according to inhomogeneity of the coil sensitivity distribution and geometry factor. Using the first method (subtraction mapping), two images were scanned with identical parameters. The SNR in each pixel divided the running mean (7 by 7 pixels in neighborhood) by standard deviation/√2 in the same region of interest. Using the second (consecutive) method, more than fifty consecutive scans of the uniform phantom were obtained with identical scan parameters. Then the SNR was calculated from the ratio of mean signal intensity to the standard deviation in each pixel on a series of images. Moreover, geometry factors were calculated from SNRs with and without parallel imaging. The SNR and geometry factor using parallel imaging in the subtraction mapping method agreed with those of the consecutive method. Both methods make it possible to obtain a more detailed determination of SNR in parallel imaging and to calculate the geometry factor.
Journal
-
- Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology
-
Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 64 (8), 930-936, 2008
Japanese Society of Radiological Technology
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390001206362246016
-
- NII Article ID
- 110006881350
-
- NII Book ID
- AN00197784
-
- COI
- 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crotlGktg%3D%3D
-
- ISSN
- 18814883
- 03694305
- http://id.crossref.org/issn/03694305
-
- NDL BIB ID
- 9627487
-
- PubMed
- 18772535
-
- Text Lang
- ja
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- JaLC
- NDL Search
- Crossref
- PubMed
- CiNii Articles
- OpenAIRE
-
- Abstract License Flag
- Disallowed