アンケート調査によるマンモグラフィ読影講習会の精度管理　〔４〕

DOI 被引用文献8件 参考文献4件
  • 古妻 嘉一
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 遠藤 登喜子
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 岩瀬 拓士
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 大貫 幸二
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 永井 宏
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 東野 英利子
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 角田 博子
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 大村 峯夫
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会
  • 増田 慎三
    同協力者
  • 中谷 守一
    同協力者
  • 森本 忠興
    マンモグラフィ精度管理中央委員会教育・研修委員会

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Quality Assurance of Mammogram Training Courses via Questionnaire : Fourth Report

この論文をさがす

説明

As more local governments adopt mammography for breast cancer screening, the shortage of qualified doctors skilled in interpreting mammograms must be resolved. In the interest of promoting skilled mammogram interpretation, the Central Committee for Quality Control of Mammographic Screening initiated examinations in mammogram interpretation (“exams” hereafter). Three exams were given before October 2001 to the attendants of the mammogram training courses (“training courses”) with the objective of upgrading prior exam grades. In order to assess the quality of the exams as given at the training courses, questionnaires were distributed after the exams. A total of 332 doctors took the 3 exams. Among them, 26 doctors (8%) obtained grade A, 161 (48%) obtained grade B, 93 (28%) grade C, and 52 (16%) grade D. Among the 100 (30%) who improved to at least grade B (qualified to interpret mammograms) were 26 (8%) who were upgraded to grade A and 74 (22%) who were upgraded to grade B. Unfortunately, 65 (20%) demonstrated a poorer performance, falling from grade B to grade C/D. The percentage of doctors who had experience reading fewer than 100 mammograms was 48%among those who downgraded, and 33% among those upgraded. Answers to questionnaires indicate that interpreting as many mammograms as possible is advisable in order to improve daily proficiency, exam performance, and patient care. Questionnaires at the exams seemed to aid in quality control.

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (8)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ