-
- 山田 圭一
- 東北大学
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- How Does Contextualism Solve the Skeptical Paradox?
- カイギロン ノ パラドクス オ ブンミャク シュギ ニ ヨッテ カイケツスル ホウホウ
この論文をさがす
説明
Epistemological contextualism holds that the truth-conditions of knowledge-attributing sentences depend on the contexts in which they are uttered. While Contextualists have presented solutions of the skeptical paradox with reference to this dependence, they are confronted with various criticisms. In this paper, I examine DeRose's solution of skepticism, and then elucidate why it fails to do justice to the persuasiveness of skeptical argument. Finally, as an alternative resolution of radical skepticism, I suggest the position of “radical contextualism” that claims not only standards of knowledge but of epistemic distinction (justification) depend on the context, and illustrate the justification model of radical contextualism in contrast with that of radical skepticism.
収録刊行物
-
- 科学基礎論研究
-
科学基礎論研究 34 (1), 11-20, 2007
科学基礎論学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390282680300468224
-
- NII論文ID
- 10018919370
-
- NII書誌ID
- AN00036945
-
- ISSN
- 18841236
- 00227668
-
- NDL書誌ID
- 8838026
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- NDL
- Crossref
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可