懐疑論のパラドクスを文脈主義によって解決する方法

DOI Web Site 参考文献21件

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • How Does Contextualism Solve the Skeptical Paradox?
  • カイギロン ノ パラドクス オ ブンミャク シュギ ニ ヨッテ カイケツスル ホウホウ

この論文をさがす

説明

Epistemological contextualism holds that the truth-conditions of knowledge-attributing sentences depend on the contexts in which they are uttered. While Contextualists have presented solutions of the skeptical paradox with reference to this dependence, they are confronted with various criticisms. In this paper, I examine DeRose's solution of skepticism, and then elucidate why it fails to do justice to the persuasiveness of skeptical argument. Finally, as an alternative resolution of radical skepticism, I suggest the position of “radical contextualism” that claims not only standards of knowledge but of epistemic distinction (justification) depend on the context, and illustrate the justification model of radical contextualism in contrast with that of radical skepticism.

収録刊行物

参考文献 (21)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ