Problems in the checkerboard method using serial twofold dilutions.

Bibliographic Information

Other Title
  • 併用効果測定のための2倍希釈系列を用いたcheckerboard法における問題点

Description

We measured in vitro the effect of combined therapy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using the modified checkerboard method with serial 1.25-fold dilutions (1.25-fold method) and a conventional method using serial twofold dilutions (twofold method) to compare the results. Vancomycin and minocyclin, which have a low MIC value, and cefotiam, which has a high MIC value, were used. In the determination of MIC value, discrepancies were found between the twofold and 1.25-fold methods even in the same strain. Discrepancies between these two methods were also observed in the combination effect in some cases. In the twofold method, decreased intensity of the MIC value in combination could be detected only in the form of (1/2) n. Therefore, in this method results with a 1/2 decrease were outwardly obtained even with a decrease of less than 1/2. On the other hand, in the 1.25-fold method it could be detected in the form of (4/5) n, and no discrepancies were found between the results of this method and the expected decrease. Thus more exact FIC indexes and MIC values in combination were obtained. In addition, the present method could detect weak antagonism that could not be detected by the twofold method. We concluded that 1.25-fold serial dilution was better than twofold dilution in the assesment of combinations of an antibiotic with a low MIC value and one with a high MIC value.

Journal

  • CHEMOTHERAPY

    CHEMOTHERAPY 42 (7), 841-848, 1994

    Japanese Society of Chemotherapy

Details 詳細情報について

  • CRID
    1390282681255978368
  • NII Article ID
    130004198547
  • DOI
    10.11250/chemotherapy1953.42.841
  • ISSN
    18845894
    00093165
  • Text Lang
    ja
  • Data Source
    • JaLC
    • CiNii Articles
  • Abstract License Flag
    Disallowed

Report a problem

Back to top