Comparison of Commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits with Agar Gel Precipitation and Hemagglutination-Inhibition Tests for Detecting Antibodies to Avian Influenza Viruses

DOI Web Site Web Site PubMed 参考文献11件
  • SHIRAISHI Rikiya
    Research Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry & Toxicology, 3–7–11 Hashimotodai, Midori-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252–0132, Japan
  • NISHIGUCHI Akiko
    Animal Quarantine Service of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan, 11–1 Haramachi, Isogo-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 235–0008, Japan
  • TSUKAMOTO Kenji
    Research Team for Zoonotic Diseases, National Institute of Animal Health, 3–1–5 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0856, Japan
  • MURAMATSU Masatake
    Research Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry & Toxicology, 3–7–11 Hashimotodai, Midori-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252–0132, Japan Present address: NAS Laboratory Co., Ltd., 680 Tokura, Tomisato, Chiba 286–0212, Japan

この論文をさがす

抄録

We evaluated the utility of 5 commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for detecting antibodies to avian influenza viruses. The sensitivities and specificities of the ELISA kits were compared with those of the agar gel precipitation (AGP) and hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) tests. The results suggest that some ELISA kits might not be suitable for monitoring during the early stages of avian influenza virus infections. Therefore, ELISA kits should only be used in conjunction with a profound knowledge about monitoring of avian influenza.

収録刊行物

参考文献 (11)*注記

もっと見る

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ