ジョン・マクダウェルの「理由の空間」とメタ法価値論の問題
-
- 伊藤 克彦
- 一橋大学大学院
書誌事項
- タイトル別名
-
- John McDowell’s “Spaces of reasons” and problems of legal meta-axiology
抄録
It seems that current jurisprudential discussions neglect legal meta-axiology (meta-ethics). For example, when we claim to be “discussing the value reasonably” in normative theory of Justice, we don’t know “what is “reasonable””. Normative theory in current discussions faces the problems of justification of theory. I propose that we should focus on legal meta-axiology (meta-ethics) to solve this problem, and this paper explains John McDowell’s meta-ethical theory and its philosophical background. McDowell criticized J. L. Mackie’s and Simon Blaclburn’s projectism through arguments on secondary quality and thick ethical concepts. Particularly, McDowell doubted the Cartesian view which is the background of their meta-ethical theory. McDowell’s meta-ethics position is based on his philosophical claim “Spaces of reasons” and criticism of “Myth of the given”. In his view, we do not receive experience that is given; we receive experience thorough concepts and beliefs. These concepts construct complex structure of justification, which McDowell called “Spaces of reasons” In my view, McDowell’s discussions is similar to significance of jurisprudential problems such as : (1) the problem of legal value, (2) critical reconsideration of the dichotonomy of fact/value, (3) analysis of “reason”, and (4) practical reason and reasoning.
収録刊行物
-
- 法哲学年報
-
法哲学年報 2007 (0), 181-190, 2008
日本法哲学会
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1390569015602966912
-
- NII論文ID
- 130008009886
-
- ISSN
- 24351075
- 03872890
-
- 本文言語コード
- ja
-
- データソース種別
-
- JaLC
- CiNii Articles
-
- 抄録ライセンスフラグ
- 使用不可