『般若灯論復注』第9章におけるサーンキヤ説考察

DOI Web Site Web Site

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • Sāṃkhya Theory in the<i> Prajñāpradīpa-ṭīkā</i> chp. 9
  • 『般若灯論複注』第9章におけるサーンキヤ説考察
  • 『 ハンニャトウロンフクチュウ 』 ダイ9ショウ ニ オケル サーンキヤセツ コウサツ

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p>The subject of criticism of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (MMK) chp. 9, when it criticizes A preceding subject existing prior to whole sensory organs, is known to be the Pudgalavādins in general, but is not specified in the MMK.</p><p>However, the Buddhapālita-mūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti (BP), an important commentary of a somewhat later time, did not specify the subject of criticism of chp. 9, criticizing A preceding subject by a parable of the window.</p><p>Since then, the Prajñāpradīpa (PP) has clarified that the subject of the BP is the Sāṃkhya school, and the Prajñāpradīpa-ṭīkā (PPṬ) succeeded to the commentary on the PP to introduce the Sāṃkhya theory in more detail.</p><p>However, the PPṬ commented on the subject of criticism of the BP as rather Sāṃkhya theory, while the Pudgalavādin is also presented as a subject of criticism of chp. 9.</p><p>Therefore, it is necessary to consider the differences between the commentaries in more detail in order to clarify the subject of criticism in chapter 9 of the MMK.</p>

収録刊行物

キーワード

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ